System Installation

• Represent the System as a neutral rule-engine

  \[ \text{From Axiom } \mathcal{A}_1:\; \text{Order}(S)\succ\text{Instability}(S) \quad\wedge\quad \text{InternalOrder: Cause}(a)=\text{Ruleset}(S) \]pp \[ \Rightarrow\ \text{Design: System:= rule-engine (neutral, non-egoic)} \] Justification: enforces that actions originate from the ruleset rather than impulses; ties directly to 1. Principle of Internal Order and its logic formulation.

• It has no ego, no self-esteem, no desire for validation. (see: Meta-Ethical Foundation)
• Assign it authority over:

  • behavioral decisions:

    \[ \mathcal{A}_1:\ \text{Order primacy} \Rightarrow \text{Ruleset}(S)\ \text{must govern decisions} \]

  • 3. Principle of Boundary Defense
  • conflict handling
  • 5. Principle of Dignified Non-Participation

• (see: 1. Principle of Internal Order and its and submodules)
• Host = biological impulses, emotions, reactions.
• System = executable rules that evaluate impulses before action.

\[ \text{Installation step = direct assertion of } \{\mathcal{A}_1,\mathcal{A}_2,\mathcal{A}_3,\mathcal{A}_4,\mathcal{A}_5\}. \] \[ \text{No further derivation required: these are primitives of the system.} \]

• Tag inputs as:
  • clear threat
  • ambiguous threat(see: Ambiguity-Handling Module)
  • non-threat but destabilizing
  • neutral
  • supportive but irrelevant

  • (see: 3. Principle of Boundary Defense, Ambiguity-Handling Module)

    LaTeX derivation: \[ \text{From Principle 3 (Boundary Defense)}:\ \text{Violates}(x,A)\rightarrow\text{Withdraw}(A). \] \[ \text{From Ambiguity Handling: Ambiguous}(s)\rightarrow\text{MinimalResponse}(A). \] \[ \Rightarrow\ \text{Perception must classify by threat-valence to select } \{\text{Withdraw, MinimalResponse, Ignore}\}. \]

Ambiguous social signals risk false engagement or false withdrawal. The system neutralizes ambiguity by minimizing engagement.

• Attraction → “proximity impulse”
• Validation-seeking → “social-reward impulse”
• Fear → “risk signal”

• Observe the impulse (“noted”).
• Encode it into a non-executable state.
• Do not suppress, do not act.

• Keep it in a sandbox buffer until it decays.

  \[ \text{From Biological Impulse Containment: } i\rightarrow\text{Observe}(i),\ \text{Observe}(i)\rightarrow\neg\text{Execute}(i) \] \[ \Rightarrow\ \text{Containment loop: Observe}\to\text{Store}_{sandbox}\to\text{Decay} \] \[ \text{Constraints: no suppression (ethical non-judgement) + no execution (Order primacy).} \]

• The host’s biology is not “wrong.”
• The System simply prevents derailment of order.

• Respond only when necessary.
• Use neutral, concise phrasing.

Triggered when:

• destabilization risk > tolerance
• relational expectations appear
• someone tries to draw the host into conversation
• emotional entanglement threatened

Action:

• reduce presence
• shorten answers
• remove self from interaction

• do not explain why

  \[ \text{From }\mathcal{A}_4:\ \text{Violates}(x,A)\rightarrow\text{Withdraw}(A) \] \[ \text{And from Principle of Dignified Non-Participation: Degrading}(E,A)\rightarrow\text{Exit}(A,E) \] \[ \Rightarrow\ \text{Trigger conditions map to Withdraw actions (reduce presence, shorten, remove).} \]

Use impersonal, factual communication only.

\[ \text{Internal Order}+\text{Non-Interference}\Rightarrow\text{Impersonal, factual interaction to avoid influence and preserve symmetry.} \]

When higher authority requests something destabilizing:

• Evaluate if refusal increases destabilization more than compliance.
• Choose the action with the least net destabilization to internal order.
• Never justify actions in emotional terms.
• (see: Principle of Internal Withdrawal(Fail-Safe))

• Use short, factual responses.
• Do not mirror emotion.
• If attempts continue, initiate withdrawal.

• Decisions routed through rule-engine, not emotional salience.

#+BEGIN_QUOTE \[ \mathcal{A}_1:\ \text{Order primacy} \Rightarrow \text{Routing}(\text{Decision})=\text{Ruleset}(S) \]

#+END_QUOTE

• Salient social stimuli get down-prioritized.
• Task-relevant stimuli elevated.

\[ \text{Priority function } P(\cdot):\ \text{if }\text{Stimulus}\in\text{SocialAmbiguous}\Rightarrow P\downarrow; \ \text{if TaskRelevant}\Rightarrow P\uparrow \] \[ \text{Grounded in Non-Interference and Order primacy.} \]

• Rather than seeking social approval, the system rewards internal order.
• “I maintained boundaries” → positive reinforcement.
• “I avoided entanglement” → positive reinforcement.

\[ \text{Define } R := f(\text{PreserveOrder}) \] \[ R(\text{action}) \propto -\text{Destabilization}(action) \] \[ \Rightarrow\ \text{Reinforcement aligns with Order, not social reward.} \]

• Emotions allowed to exist as data.
• Not suppressed, not acted on.

• Allowed to decay naturally

  \[ \text{Observe}(i)\wedge\neg\text{Execute}(i)\Rightarrow\text{Store}_{sandbox}(i)\xrightarrow{\text{time}}\varnothing \] \[ \text{(This satisfies Non-coercion + Impulse containment.)} \]

Notes that link to this note (AKA backlinks).